My Hero Academia: Why is Momo Yaoyorozu's costume so revealing? Explained

The design of Momo Yaoyorozu's hero costume in My Hero Academia has sparked significant discussion and debate among fans. Critics argue that her revealing outfit sexualizes a teenage character, while others defend it as functional or even empowering. Let's delve into the arguments surrounding Momo's costume and explore the complex perspectives on its design.

Arguments for the Costume:

• Functionality: Proponents of the costume highlight its practicality. Momo's Quirk, Creation, allows her to create non-living objects from her bare skin. Her revealing outfit maximizes the surface area available for materialization, enabling her to quickly generate larger and more complex objects in combat. Her gauntlets and boots further enhance her Quirk's usage by providing channels for materialization.
• Character Development: Some argue that the costume reflects Momo's growth and confidence. In earlier chapters, she expresses discomfort with her revealing attire, symbolizing her insecurities and self-doubt. However, as she matures and embraces her Quirk, she seems more comfortable in the costume, signifying her self-acceptance and empowerment.
• Artistic Choice: Defenders of the design point to Horikoshi's artistic style, which often features stylized and revealing costumes for both male and female characters. They argue that the focus on functionality and character development outweighs any potential sexualization, and that judging the costume solely on its revealing nature ignores the broader context of the narrative and art style.

Arguments against the Costume:

• Sexualization: Critics argue that the costume unnecessarily sexualizes a underage character, drawing undue attention to her body and objectifying her. They highlight the tight-fitting nature of the outfit, the high leg slits, and the exposed midriff as elements that contribute to this perception.
• Double Standards: Critics point out that male characters with similar Quirks, like Ojiro, have more covered-up costumes. This perceived double standard fuels accusations of gender bias and reinforces harmful stereotypes about female heroes needing to be visually appealing to be effective.
• Distraction from Character: Some argue that the costume detracts from Momo's development and relegates her to a stereotypical "fan service" character. They believe her abilities and personality deserve more focus than her physical appearance, and that the revealing outfit undermines her potential as a strong and complex hero.

Horikoshi's Response:

Horikoshi himself has addressed the controversy surrounding Momo's costume. He acknowledges the concerns of fans and emphasizes that he strives to create costumes that are both functional and visually appealing. However, he also maintains that he ultimately designs the costumes based on his own artistic vision and the characters' Quirks.

Conclusion:

The debate surrounding Momo Yaoyorozu's costume is multifaceted and reflects broader discussions about the portrayal of female characters in superhero media. Ultimately, whether you find the costume empowering or problematic is a matter of personal interpretation. However, it's important to acknowledge the valid arguments on both sides and engage in respectful dialogue about these complex issues.

My Hero Academia offers a platform for diverse characters and Quirks, and Momo's story is one of growth, self-discovery, and pushing boundaries. While the costume might be a point of contention, it's crucial to remember that it's just one aspect of her overall development as a hero. Her true strength lies in her intelligence, resourcefulness, and unwavering determination, not in the design of her outfit.

Note:

I